BMME303
Accounting, Analysis and Governance in Complex Deals
Structure Needed!
Which transactions/complex deals do we observe in practice?
Why and how do complex deals take place?
Acquisitions \(\rightarrow\) acquiring a controlling stake in a target’s shares: share deal
Asset deal \(\rightarrow\) acquirer acquires (substantially all the) assets and liabilities of the target without buying the corporate shell/shares (complexity is increasing with the amount of assets because assets are transferred individually)
Share deal \(\rightarrow\) acquirer acquires a controlling stake in the target’s shares
Merger \(\rightarrow\) an existing, reorganizing company (BCo) merges into another company (ACo) and BCo ceases to exist
Where’s the M in the M&A we read about in the news then?
Both existing companies (ACo & BCo) merge and become part of a new legal entity (NewCo). ACo and BCo cease to exist as independent legal entities
What are economic (think about the involved parties’ perceptions of the deal!) reasons for choosing a consolidation over a merger?
Establishing a NewCo suggests that involved parties are on the same level playing field (no dominant partner, which performs a “takeover”)
“Using the term merger of equals inevitably sets the parties up for unrealistic expectations of equality and integration.”1
Splitting is a technique to separate the assets and liabilities of one entity and to allocate them to multiple entities
A split-up is the exact opposite of a merger or consolidation (why?)
Definition
The entity splitting up transfers its assets and liabilities as a whole to two or more already existing or newly-established entities
The splitting entity is dissolved (without formal liquidation procedure)
The shareholder(s) of the splitting entity obtain shares in the entities acquiring the assets and liabilities
In comparison to a merger, the direction of the asset/liability transfer is reversed: many-to-one (Merger) vs. one-to-many (Split-Up)
The splitting entity (SplitCo) transfers part of its assets and liabilities to one or more already existing or newly-established entities (ACo/BCo)
Spin-Off \(\rightarrow\) SplitCo’s shareholders receive shares in ACo/BCo without giving up their shares in SplitCo
Split-Off \(\rightarrow\) SplitCo’s shareholders exchange their shares in SplitCo for shares in ACo/BCo
The splitting entity (CarveCo) transfers part of its assets and liabilities to one or more already existing or newly-established entities (ACo)
Carve Out \(\rightarrow\) the transferring entity (not its shareholders) obtains shares in the entity or entities acquiring the assets and liabilities
The entity acquiring assets and liabilities (ACo) becomes a subsidiary of CarveCo
| Reorganization | Reorganizing Company’s Fate | Shareholders of Reorganizing Company |
|---|---|---|
| Split-Up | Ceases to exist | Shareholders receive shares in multiple (new) entities |
| Spin-Off (Split-Off) | Continues to exist | Shareholders receive shares in receiving entity (spilt-off: exchange shares) |
| Carve-Out | Continues to exist | No immediate shareholder impact |
Note that the organizational charts on the splittings depict cases where the receiving entities are already existing. In case the receiving entities are newly-established entities the charts would look different but the classification of the transaction would not change.
FT 2024: Comeback from?
Relationship between Siemens Energy and German conglomerate Siemens?
In 2020, the German industry giant Siemens decided to divest its Energy business
Siemens’ shareholders and Siemens itself became shareholders of Siemens Energy
How can the splitting be characterized?
\(\Rightarrow\) We’ll start with the role of Governance
Titlepage photo by Dennis Möller on Unsplash